Edwards reaffirms. Only not that Edwards.
May 11, 2009 Heart and spirit, O Mores!
Remember this one? “Edwards reaffirms key political question.” And this, its predecessor.
Oh, did I get abused for this. Even by some pretty slick brains. How could I be so mean.
Well. And… and… to Her.
And now? It’s as if I’m the only one left who hasn’t piled on at this point.
But wasn’t that a different issue? The cancer? The suffering, saintly wife?
Not at all. It’s all of a piece. Two things:
- People like this are made for each other. That doesn’t excuse the humiliation visited on their wives, but it does tell you something about a woman who would be with the likes of such men in the first place.
- Anyone who couldn’t see what a cynical, wicked phony John Edwards is — and I don’t mean a mere scamp like Bill Clinton, but an utterly soul-less, ambition driven, demagogue with a potentially unlimited capacity for unprincipled rule — from “go” wasn’t looking.
Silky pony indeed.
UPDATE: What were my mean old words? That he was either “a liar or a moral retard.” Yea-heah.
Leave a Reply