Remember the price signals thingy?

I do! I was reminded by this post over at Rick Moore’s:

Back when the economic crisis first hit at the end of September, Donald Trump predicted that oil could fall to $20 a barrel. Gulf Oil thinks that’s where it’s headed:

RANDOLPH

2 Responses to “Remember the price signals thingy?”

  1. James H Says:

    Ron:

    Should we be paying attention to what ANY market is saying right now? The wild shifts in prices, including oil prices and the Dow’s swaying, imply the markets are basically confused right now and won’t settle down until there’s a more certain economic policy in place.

    Next point: The downward shift in oil prices may be only a short-term pressure. In the long term, aren’t oil prices more likely to rise?


  2. Ron Coleman Says:

    Markets have short-term bubbles, yes, but if you look at the trends the bubble was the preposterous pricing of this fall, not the current price.

    Anyway, even if you were right, when is this “long term”? Would you buy a CD that promised to pay you back a great return “in the long term”? Would you make me buy one, i.e., use taxpayer money to guess at these trends?

    And why on earth would you think that the long term for oil is different from other commodities? Because there’s a finite supply? That’s true of all commodities , yet prices do not merely rise, and frequently fall, because of the effects of how the free market directs choice and long run optimization of the allocation of most resources. The same is true of oil. Haven’t you ever read Julian Simon? Here’s a thoughtful discussion — and I include the comments — of some of the issues, actually, though comments trail off well before the recent drop in prices.


  • View Ron Coleman's profile on LinkedIn


  • RSS LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® blog

    • Tens years of Overlawyering
      Overlawyered turns 10.  Congratulations!  There was really blogging ten years ago? I didn’t miss the anniversary.  I just didn’t want to be accused of cadging for a link. […]
    • Holding Caulfield (corrected)
      I could have linked to a million stories on this, but Publishers Weekly seems appropriate: Finding that author J.D. Salinger is “likely to succeed on the merits of its copyright case,” a federal judge granted a preliminary injunction late on Wednesday afternoon, barring the publication of what Salinger’s attorneys called an unauthorized sequel to The Catcher […]
    • He just bought it like that
      Impulse buying, King of Pop style: Branca had a surprise for Jackson. The attorney said casually, ‘By the way, the ATV catalogue is available.’ Jackson looked puzzled. Branca added teasingly, ‘It includes a few things you might be interested in.’ ‘Like what?’ Jackson asked. ‘Northern Songs,’ Branca replied. Jackson recognized that name. ‘You mean the Norther […]
    • Royal mess
      Burger King’s trademark place is kind of funny.   If you Google His Majesty’s Monicker along with the word TRADEMARK, you get this link, which not only asserts, naturally, his royal BURGER KING® registered mark, but the far more dubious BK® mark down at the bottom, yet not at all (on that page) the ancient [...] […]
    • When you’re a hammer
      The whole world is a nail. Now Marty Schwimmer isn’t a hammer, because he does trademarks and not patents, see.  So this post connecting Michael Jackson and intellectual property is not proof that Michael Jackson’s death is a nail! (Single-glove-tip on the actual patent to Andie Schwartz!) […]
  • Likelihood of Exposure

    Evening alight

    Storming over from Jersey

    The assault

    After the deluge

    Calm in the west

    Another picture of 34th Street

    Snatch of convergence

    Rolex Building

    More Photos
  • eXTReMe Tracker