My ears are burning!
Dec 3, 2008 Social networking
And there’s not a darned thing I can do about it!
Recent Post
Recent Comments
- Elle:Happiness cannot be bought. Ha
- Jonathan:Thanks. It was good while it l
- Bob Miller:This was a reasonable cost-ben
- Ron Coleman:Thanks, Venkat. I am only scr
- Ron Coleman:Thanks, Abe.
LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®- Rosetta Stone v. Google: Lost in translation September 1, 2010When courts consider search engine company liability for trademark infringement, whether direct or indirect, they typically focus on the sale of “trademarked” keywords, or search terms, to third parties for use in advertising and directing internet traffic to websites that compete with the trademark owner, as recently demonstrated in Rescuecom v. Google. If […]
- Grey is OK August 30, 2010Originally posted 2006-04-05 12:48:34. Republished by Blog Post Promoter The Business Review (Albany) reports (reg. required) on what could be a very important decision relating to the importation of grey goods: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has directed the U.S. International Trade Commission to reconsider its ruling prohibiting domestic […]
- Not safe for work August 30, 2010Blawg Review #279 is up at Mirriam Seddiq’s Not Guilty blog. It’s not safe for work. Unless you work in a law office. Home… that’s something else. Not safe for work ©, . […]
- ABA Journal on Bloggers August 25, 2010Originally posted 2005-07-15 14:09:49. Republished by Blog Post PromoterThe ABA Journal has an article on bloggers which mentions the Media Bloggers Association and quotes my own self. This is progress, I guess: Ten years ago I was writing for the ABA Journal, and now the ABA Journal‘s writing about me! That doesn’t mean I’ll rejoin […]
- “Infinity Dollars” — IP damages and the jury, Part 1 August 25, 2010Originally posted 2009-06-19 12:07:08. Republished by Blog Post PromoterA lot of people, including judges, lawyers and civilians, don’t seem to really understand what statutory damages are all about. They are not supposed to be a windfall (discussed more here). But just tell that to the jury that awarded “infinity dollars” — practically — to the […]
- Rosetta Stone v. Google: Lost in translation September 1, 2010
-
-
Likelihood of Exposure
More Photos -
-
December 3rd, 2008 at 10:42 am
Great post, because I do the same thing. You see a bunch of hits from a random site, want to find out why they all came to the blog, you follow the link, and it is a massive forum site with tens of thousands of messages, and a search function that doesn’t let you search the text of the posts.
Very annoying
December 3rd, 2008 at 11:18 am
Did you see what the post was about- in ravelry? I just stumbled upon it a bit ago. they were discussing the post you had a while back (july 2008, maybe?) about Fowler filing suit against zondervan and thomas nelson . They were discussing the silliness of men who think they can change the Bible to whatever suits or soothes their conscience . Your post then was quite interesting and educational. I think i will look forward to reading more from you- H
December 3rd, 2008 at 11:32 am
No, Heather, I didn’t, because as I said it’s behind a wall. Maybe you’re a Ravelry member?
Thanks for your kind comments!
December 3rd, 2008 at 11:55 am
yes, i am…and that is how i found your blog- here is the original post
December 4th, 2008 at 11:56 pm
Insert obligatory puns about the “fabric of the law” and “narrow tailoring” here.