<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not so strange bedfellows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2008/05/11/not-so-strange-bedfellows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2008/05/11/not-so-strange-bedfellows/</link>
	<description>Ron Coleman’s pretty good blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:46:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mary</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2008/05/11/not-so-strange-bedfellows/comment-page-1/#comment-3581</link>
		<dc:creator>mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerseylaw.wordpress.com/?p=1114#comment-3581</guid>
		<description>“Writers and scholars, particularly Westerners, who lay claim to Hezbollah sources, are regarded as special for penetrating so closed a society.&quot;

Young is probably right about that, but we&#039;re wrong about Hezbollah being &#039;closed&#039;. I traveled to Beirut in Dec. 2006 (when Hezbollah was also threatening to take over the airport). I had never been to the Middle East before, and I looked every bit like the American soccer mom I am, but my taxi driver assumed I was a reporter, and he offered to take me on a tour of the Hezbollah-controlled areas in the south. When we drove past a poster of Nasrallah, the taxi driver said &#039;there&#039;s the man&#039;, so I assumed he was working with, or at least friendly to,- Hezbollah.

From that offer, I&#039;d guess that Hezbollah is about as &#039;closed&#039; to westerners as the double decker  busses are to tourists arriving in JFK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Writers and scholars, particularly Westerners, who lay claim to Hezbollah sources, are regarded as special for penetrating so closed a society.&#8221;</p>
<p>Young is probably right about that, but we&#8217;re wrong about Hezbollah being &#8216;closed&#8217;. I traveled to Beirut in Dec. 2006 (when Hezbollah was also threatening to take over the airport). I had never been to the Middle East before, and I looked every bit like the American soccer mom I am, but my taxi driver assumed I was a reporter, and he offered to take me on a tour of the Hezbollah-controlled areas in the south. When we drove past a poster of Nasrallah, the taxi driver said &#8216;there&#8217;s the man&#8217;, so I assumed he was working with, or at least friendly to,- Hezbollah.</p>
<p>From that offer, I&#8217;d guess that Hezbollah is about as &#8216;closed&#8217; to westerners as the double decker  busses are to tourists arriving in JFK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hydralisk</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2008/05/11/not-so-strange-bedfellows/comment-page-1/#comment-3582</link>
		<dc:creator>hydralisk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 10:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerseylaw.wordpress.com/?p=1114#comment-3582</guid>
		<description>The fact is not shocking &#039;cause we&#039;re accustomed to it, but the reasons for it are interesting.

&quot;Writers and scholars, particularly Westerners, who lay claim to Hezbollah sources, are regarded as special for penetrating so closed a society. That&#039;s why their writing is often edited with minimal rigor.&quot;

That explanation had perpetually been on the tip of my mind&#039;s tongue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is not shocking &#8217;cause we&#8217;re accustomed to it, but the reasons for it are interesting.</p>
<p>&#8220;Writers and scholars, particularly Westerners, who lay claim to Hezbollah sources, are regarded as special for penetrating so closed a society. That&#8217;s why their writing is often edited with minimal rigor.&#8221;</p>
<p>That explanation had perpetually been on the tip of my mind&#8217;s tongue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.376 seconds -->
