Thought balls?

Mickey Kaus:

a thought born embalmed as a cliche, already tiresome from anticipated over-expression before being sincerely expressed in the first place

Wow, he’s so out in front of whatever it is he’s talking about that I, for one, have no idea what on earth he’s talking about.

No Responses to “Thought balls?”

  1. Ara Says:

    Welcome to the club — Kaus is virtually unreadable. He’s convinced that it’s his mission to use every single one of the 14 punctuation marks in his posts on any given day.


  2. snickering.... Says:

    snicker… snicker… snicker…
    oh, dear.. well, it’s obvious what he’s talking about right…?

    “a thought born embalmed as a cliche, already tiresome from anticipated over-expression before being sincerely expressed in the first place”

    imagine wee little thought sneaking around your head not really fully formed, but it occurs to you repeatedly, but you just can’t nudge the thing out of your head… finally you say it and it’s already so old hat/cliche/tired old thought by the time you figure out how to phrase it…it kind of reminds you of a cat hairball… gross, growing into a natty lump, and utterly unusable for sophisticated interactions… but you use it anyway, because it is appropriate for the moment, but you’re already tired of it.

    um… if that isn’t what he means.. then (lol) I have no clue either, but reading stuff like that would drive me to go to the icanhascheezburger site and look at adorable cat images with lousy grammatical writing all day long for weeks…
    oh wait, I think I have already indulged in that and no longer know much about grammar anymore.

    oops.
    sorry.


  3. Bob Miller Says:

    Easy—a self-referential statement!


  • View Ron Coleman's profile on LinkedIn


  • RSS LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® blog

    • Tens years of Overlawyering
      Overlawyered turns 10.  Congratulations!  There was really blogging ten years ago? I didn’t miss the anniversary.  I just didn’t want to be accused of cadging for a link. […]
    • Holding Caulfield (corrected)
      I could have linked to a million stories on this, but Publishers Weekly seems appropriate: Finding that author J.D. Salinger is “likely to succeed on the merits of its copyright case,” a federal judge granted a preliminary injunction late on Wednesday afternoon, barring the publication of what Salinger’s attorneys called an unauthorized sequel to The Catcher […]
    • He just bought it like that
      Impulse buying, King of Pop style: Branca had a surprise for Jackson. The attorney said casually, ‘By the way, the ATV catalogue is available.’ Jackson looked puzzled. Branca added teasingly, ‘It includes a few things you might be interested in.’ ‘Like what?’ Jackson asked. ‘Northern Songs,’ Branca replied. Jackson recognized that name. ‘You mean the Norther […]
    • Royal mess
      Burger King’s trademark place is kind of funny.   If you Google His Majesty’s Monicker along with the word TRADEMARK, you get this link, which not only asserts, naturally, his royal BURGER KING® registered mark, but the far more dubious BK® mark down at the bottom, yet not at all (on that page) the ancient [...] […]
    • When you’re a hammer
      The whole world is a nail. Now Marty Schwimmer isn’t a hammer, because he does trademarks and not patents, see.  So this post connecting Michael Jackson and intellectual property is not proof that Michael Jackson’s death is a nail! (Single-glove-tip on the actual patent to Andie Schwartz!) […]
  • Likelihood of Exposure

    Evening alight

    Storming over from Jersey

    The assault

    After the deluge

    Calm in the west

    Another picture of 34th Street

    Snatch of convergence

    Rolex Building

    More Photos
  • eXTReMe Tracker