<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview with a &#8220;Prude&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2008/04/25/interview-with-a-prude/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2008/04/25/interview-with-a-prude/</link>
	<description>Ron Coleman’s retired general topic blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:32:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roland Dodds</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2008/04/25/interview-with-a-prude/comment-page-1/#comment-3516</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland Dodds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerseylaw.wordpress.com/?p=1084#comment-3516</guid>
		<description>OT - &lt;a href=&quot;http://butiamaliberal.blogspot.com/2008/04/i-was-tagged-by-both-contentious.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tag&lt;/a&gt;, you’re it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT &#8211; <a href="http://butiamaliberal.blogspot.com/2008/04/i-was-tagged-by-both-contentious.html" rel="nofollow">Tag</a>, you’re it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Punning Pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2008/04/25/interview-with-a-prude/comment-page-1/#comment-3515</link>
		<dc:creator>Punning Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerseylaw.wordpress.com/?p=1084#comment-3515</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If you’re the kind of young woman who doesn’t understand why it’s important not just to have sex with any guy that wants you to&lt;/i&gt;

It sounds like the idea isn&#039;t &quot;don&#039;t have sex before marriage&quot;, but rather &quot;only have sex because you both want to, rather than only one party wanting to&quot;.  Problem solved, and we all get a lot more nookie...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If you’re the kind of young woman who doesn’t understand why it’s important not just to have sex with any guy that wants you to</i></p>
<p>It sounds like the idea isn&#8217;t &#8220;don&#8217;t have sex before marriage&#8221;, but rather &#8220;only have sex because you both want to, rather than only one party wanting to&#8221;.  Problem solved, and we all get a lot more nookie&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.245 seconds -->
