This entry was posted
on Wednesday, March 19th, 2008 at 11:56 am and is filed under Jocularity, Suburbia.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
When courts consider search engine company liability for trademark infringement, whether direct or indirect, they typically focus on the sale of “trademarked” keywords, or search terms, to third parties for use in advertising and directing internet traffic to websites that compete with the trademark owner, as recently demonstrated in Rescuecom v. Google. If […]
Originally posted 2006-04-05 12:48:34. Republished by Blog Post Promoter The Business Review (Albany) reports (reg. required) on what could be a very important decision relating to the importation of grey goods: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has directed the U.S. International Trade Commission to reconsider its ruling prohibiting domestic […]
Originally posted 2005-07-15 14:09:49. Republished by Blog Post PromoterThe ABA Journal has an article on bloggers which mentions the Media Bloggers Association and quotes my own self. This is progress, I guess: Ten years ago I was writing for the ABA Journal, and now the ABA Journal‘s writing about me! That doesn’t mean I’ll rejoin […]
Originally posted 2009-06-19 12:07:08. Republished by Blog Post PromoterA lot of people, including judges, lawyers and civilians, don’t seem to really understand what statutory damages are all about. They are not supposed to be a windfall (discussed more here). But just tell that to the jury that awarded “infinity dollars” — practically — to the […]
March 19th, 2008 at 12:25 pm
Isn’t “time out” supposed to be a punishment?
March 19th, 2008 at 3:55 pm
There are different kinds of time out, I think.
March 19th, 2008 at 4:40 pm
Or maybe its a really bad wine….
March 20th, 2008 at 6:29 am
The Stones sang about “mother’s little helper.”
April 10th, 2008 at 1:13 pm
Finally…somebody gets it!