Now, that’s terrorism!

E-mail Comment Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Furl

Feb 10, 2008 Orient, Sisyphus

WELL, DUH: Poll finds plummeting support for the Taliban, Osama bin Laden. Generally, once they start blowing up fellow-Muslims, their support plummets. And whatever else you say about the Bush Administration’s strategy, it seems almost as if it were tailor-made to produce this result.

Actually a rather hoary story, at this point, though yes, the opposition will not admit it. I just keep asking, though: What do we have to do get them to disapprove of blowing up the rest of us?

This entry was posted on Sunday, February 10th, 2008 at 9:28 pm and is filed under Orient, Sisyphus. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

No Responses to “Now, that’s terrorism!”

Ara Says:

February 11th, 2008 at 8:34 am
What do we have to do get them to disapprove of blowing up the rest of us?

I know! We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity.
mary Says:

February 11th, 2008 at 1:35 pm
What do we have to do get them to disapprove of blowing up the rest of us?

If “the opposition” are the people at war with us, why should they disapprove of blowing us up? They’re at war, blowing us up is their job.

Our job is to stop them from blowing us up, but in all fairness, getting them to surrender is the most we can expect.

Advertise Here

Recent Comments

Punning Pundit:Most of these responses look l
David Nieporent:I don't see how the gratuitous
Ron Coleman:Alon, I can't think of anythin
Alon Levy:Ron, American inner cities dec
Tom DeGisi:Yes, it sounds like a normal c
Sarah Resnick:I think we can think about thi
Punning Pundit:Don't kid yourself. This stud
Jim:"Our senior most gay member of
Watch Year One Online Free:Not that I'm totally impressed
Watch Year One Online Free:This is very up-to-date inform

LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® blog
- Tens years of Overlawyering
  Overlawyered turns 10. Congratulations! There was really blogging ten years ago? I didn’t miss the anniversary. I just didn’t want to be accused of cadging for a link. […]
- Holding Caulfield (corrected)
  I could have linked to a million stories on this, but Publishers Weekly seems appropriate: Finding that author J.D. Salinger is “likely to succeed on the merits of its copyright case,” a federal judge granted a preliminary injunction late on Wednesday afternoon, barring the publication of what Salinger’s attorneys called an unauthorized sequel to The Catcher […]
- He just bought it like that
  Impulse buying, King of Pop style: Branca had a surprise for Jackson. The attorney said casually, ‘By the way, the ATV catalogue is available.’ Jackson looked puzzled. Branca added teasingly, ‘It includes a few things you might be interested in.’ ‘Like what?’ Jackson asked. ‘Northern Songs,’ Branca replied. Jackson recognized that name. ‘You mean the Norther […]
- Royal mess
  Burger King’s trademark place is kind of funny. If you Google His Majesty’s Monicker along with the word TRADEMARK, you get this link, which not only asserts, naturally, his royal BURGER KING® registered mark, but the far more dubious BK® mark down at the bottom, yet not at all (on that page) the ancient [...] […]
- When you’re a hammer
  The whole world is a nail. Now Marty Schwimmer isn’t a hammer, because he does trademarks and not patents, see. So this post connecting Michael Jackson and intellectual property is not proof that Michael Jackson’s death is a nail! (Single-glove-tip on the actual patent to Andie Schwartz!) […]
Likelihood of Exposure

More Photos