This entry was posted
on Thursday, January 31st, 2008 at 5:52 pm and is filed under Lex scripta, Sisyphus.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Heh. I haven’t heard anyone talk about jury nullification since law school, where oddly enough, two of my professors had a very heated proxy debate (i.e. they had their student followers debating for them).
I don’t know; why should it be any worse than getting a majority of 535 egomaniacs to agree? I figure that jury nullification should be a partial offset for taking the election of senators away from the state legislatures.
When courts consider search engine company liability for trademark infringement, whether direct or indirect, they typically focus on the sale of “trademarked” keywords, or search terms, to third parties for use in advertising and directing internet traffic to websites that compete with the trademark owner, as recently demonstrated in Rescuecom v. Google. If […]
Originally posted 2006-04-05 12:48:34. Republished by Blog Post Promoter The Business Review (Albany) reports (reg. required) on what could be a very important decision relating to the importation of grey goods: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has directed the U.S. International Trade Commission to reconsider its ruling prohibiting domestic […]
Originally posted 2005-07-15 14:09:49. Republished by Blog Post PromoterThe ABA Journal has an article on bloggers which mentions the Media Bloggers Association and quotes my own self. This is progress, I guess: Ten years ago I was writing for the ABA Journal, and now the ABA Journal‘s writing about me! That doesn’t mean I’ll rejoin […]
Originally posted 2009-06-19 12:07:08. Republished by Blog Post PromoterA lot of people, including judges, lawyers and civilians, don’t seem to really understand what statutory damages are all about. They are not supposed to be a windfall (discussed more here). But just tell that to the jury that awarded “infinity dollars” — practically — to the […]
January 31st, 2008 at 7:55 pm
Heh. I haven’t heard anyone talk about jury nullification since law school, where oddly enough, two of my professors had a very heated proxy debate (i.e. they had their student followers debating for them).
February 2nd, 2008 at 7:41 pm
I don’t know; why should it be any worse than getting a majority of 535 egomaniacs to agree? I figure that jury nullification should be a partial offset for taking the election of senators away from the state legislatures.