Good for the Jews?
Jan 16, 2008 Politics and Poker
Obama, that is. Not so clear. David Kelsey has a unique take on how to answer that question.
Recent Post
Recent Comments
- Elle:Happiness cannot be bought. Ha
- Jonathan:Thanks. It was good while it l
- Bob Miller:This was a reasonable cost-ben
- Ron Coleman:Thanks, Venkat. I am only scr
- Ron Coleman:Thanks, Abe.
LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®- Secondary Trademark Infringement treatise updated for 2010-11 September 6, 2010From the Overview to the update of Secondary Trademark Infringement by Jane Coleman, which is now complete: Of all the contexts in which secondary liability has been raised, whether contributory or vicarious, the Internet has by far generated the most interest and attention. The advent of Internet commerce has created new problems for the law to […]
- The infringement that never has to say “likelihood of confusion” September 6, 2010Originally posted 2006-02-21 10:40:47. Republished by Blog Post PromoterProfessor Eric Goldman writes about the latest unfortunate development in the extension of “initial interest confusion,” that “infringement” of the Lanham Act that continues the trend eviscerating the doctrine of nominative fair use. Initial interest confusion, which means that no real d […]
- Blawg Review #280 September 6, 2010Rosh Hashanah, the beginning of the Jewish New Year, begins this Wednesday night. And what could be a more appropriate occasion for Blawg Review—for us to pass judgment on a world of law blogging about law, justice and perhaps even mercy—than the Day of Judgment? Lest anyone think that Rosh Hashanah is of mere sectarian […]
- Edifice complex September 3, 2010It’s the Singularity a-borning! On the two-year anniversary of my joining Goetz Fitzpatrick LLP, a law firm predominantly focused on construction law, I’ve written a blog post, as a guest of high-octane social-media-juicing lawyer Christopher Hill at his Construction Law Musings blog. It’s about protecting the trade secrets embodied in a subcontractor’s pro […]
- eBay wins Tiffany case September 1, 2010Originally posted 2008-07-14 16:10:07. Republished by Blog Post PromoterReuters reports that Tiffany’s gamble has not paid off: EBay Inc scored a major legal victory on Monday, when a federal judge ruled that Tiffany & Co failed to prove the online auctioneer was responsible for the sale of fake Tiffany jewelry on its website. “The Court […]
- Secondary Trademark Infringement treatise updated for 2010-11 September 6, 2010
-
-
Likelihood of Exposure
More Photos -
-
January 17th, 2008 at 3:38 am
Adam LeBor had a similar piece titled “Barack Obama Is Good For The Jews” at Jewcy recently. It wasn’t very good, but what you gonna do.
January 17th, 2008 at 8:18 am
A commenter at Kelsey’s blog says this, and it’s a fair point:
Of course, the real issue is not that Obama is a follower of Farrakhan (which he isn’t), it’s that Obama is a follower of Wright. And Obama doesn’t address that.
Well, actually he already has, but the point is a valid one.
That said, I’m glad we now know the truth about Farrakhan and Rev. Wright. And given that, I could never vote for either one of them.
Obama, on the other hand, has demonstrated that he would be an excellent choice for president of all the American people, not just some of them. We’ve barely survived seven years of that already and don’t want any more of it.
October 31st, 2008 at 12:25 am
[...] by Ron Coleman on October 30, 2008 We’ve been here before, and then some. Now we’re back in multimedia! Well, one medium. Medium [...]