<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Goodbye, Harry&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/12/29/goodbye-harry-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/12/29/goodbye-harry-2/</link>
	<description>Ron Coleman’s retired general topic blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:51:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: soccer dad</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/12/29/goodbye-harry-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2660</link>
		<dc:creator>soccer dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/12/29/goodbye-harry-2/#comment-2660</guid>
		<description>Rowling&#039;s aversion to statism is well demonstrated in the books. However in subsequent interviews she said that she viewed Kingsley Shacklebot&#039;s ascension to Minister of Magic to be a turning where the wizarding world is returned to a time of good governance. It seems to be that she may well believe in a good bureaucracy - if the right people are in charge. She gives no indication of any fundamental change in Wizards&#039; self government, other than a change in personnel.
i.e. I don&#039;t think she&#039;s the libertarian many people make her out to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rowling&#8217;s aversion to statism is well demonstrated in the books. However in subsequent interviews she said that she viewed Kingsley Shacklebot&#8217;s ascension to Minister of Magic to be a turning where the wizarding world is returned to a time of good governance. It seems to be that she may well believe in a good bureaucracy &#8211; if the right people are in charge. She gives no indication of any fundamental change in Wizards&#8217; self government, other than a change in personnel.<br />
i.e. I don&#8217;t think she&#8217;s the libertarian many people make her out to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.900 seconds -->
