Democrats can’t lose in ’08
Sep 10, 2007 Politics and Poker
As long as they run against “W.”
The problem, of course, is that he’s not running in ’08.
Recent Post
Recent Comments
- Elle:Happiness cannot be bought. Ha
- Jonathan:Thanks. It was good while it l
- Bob Miller:This was a reasonable cost-ben
- Ron Coleman:Thanks, Venkat. I am only scr
- Ron Coleman:Thanks, Abe.
LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®- Rosetta Stone v. Google: Lost in translation September 1, 2010When courts consider search engine company liability for trademark infringement, whether direct or indirect, they typically focus on the sale of “trademarked” keywords, or search terms, to third parties for use in advertising and directing internet traffic to websites that compete with the trademark owner, as recently demonstrated in Rescuecom v. Google. If […]
- Grey is OK August 30, 2010Originally posted 2006-04-05 12:48:34. Republished by Blog Post Promoter The Business Review (Albany) reports (reg. required) on what could be a very important decision relating to the importation of grey goods: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has directed the U.S. International Trade Commission to reconsider its ruling prohibiting domestic […]
- Not safe for work August 30, 2010Blawg Review #279 is up at Mirriam Seddiq’s Not Guilty blog. It’s not safe for work. Unless you work in a law office. Home… that’s something else. Not safe for work ©, . […]
- ABA Journal on Bloggers August 25, 2010Originally posted 2005-07-15 14:09:49. Republished by Blog Post PromoterThe ABA Journal has an article on bloggers which mentions the Media Bloggers Association and quotes my own self. This is progress, I guess: Ten years ago I was writing for the ABA Journal, and now the ABA Journal‘s writing about me! That doesn’t mean I’ll rejoin […]
- “Infinity Dollars” — IP damages and the jury, Part 1 August 25, 2010Originally posted 2009-06-19 12:07:08. Republished by Blog Post PromoterA lot of people, including judges, lawyers and civilians, don’t seem to really understand what statutory damages are all about. They are not supposed to be a windfall (discussed more here). But just tell that to the jury that awarded “infinity dollars” — practically — to the […]
- Rosetta Stone v. Google: Lost in translation September 1, 2010
-
-
Likelihood of Exposure
More Photos -
-
September 10th, 2007 at 5:38 pm
Anytime someone says “can’t lose” I clamp down on my wallet.
P.S. Dems don’t have to run against Bush. They just have to portray the Republican nominee as ushering in Bush’s third term.
That won’t be hard: even at rock bottom Bush could count on 70% of Republicans approving of the job he’s done. So its pretty clear their nominee will probably be a rubber stamp.
Seing it this way, Independents will have every reason to run like the wind — in the other direction. The End.
A slam dunk? Hardly. But it ain’t rocket science either.
September 10th, 2007 at 5:50 pm
For example, take Rudy (please!), who I’m pretty sure is going to get the nomination. If it were up to me, the Dem nominee would play a small snippet of Giuliani’s speech to the ’04 GOP convention:
“Without really thinking, based on just emotion, spontaneous, I grabbed the arm of then-Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik, and I said to him, ‘Bernie, thank God George Bush is our president.’ I say it again tonight:
“Thank God that George Bush is our president, and thank God that Dick Cheney, a man with his experience and his knowledge and his strength and his background, is our vice president.”
Kerik, Bush, Cheney! The slot machine rolls three cherries and the silver dollars come rushing out.
September 11th, 2007 at 10:41 am
The sorry performance of the Democrat-led Congress (the one that sends emissaries to far-flung terrorist-led countries like Syria to dump on America) is bound to be a factor, too, unless the Democratic nominee is not in Congress.