<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The invisible wand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/07/21/the-invisible-wand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/07/21/the-invisible-wand/</link>
	<description>Ron Coleman’s pretty good blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:39:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Working out those wands &#171; Likelihood of Success</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/07/21/the-invisible-wand/comment-page-1/#comment-1440</link>
		<dc:creator>Working out those wands &#171; Likelihood of Success</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 23:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/07/21/the-invisible-wand/#comment-1440</guid>
		<description>[...] by Ron Coleman on September 24th, 2007  I&#8217;ve already commented on the wizarding economy and put forth my review of the last Harry Potter book.  I recently enunciated, in my own head, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Ron Coleman on September 24th, 2007  I&#8217;ve already commented on the wizarding economy and put forth my review of the last Harry Potter book.  I recently enunciated, in my own head, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Pate</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/07/21/the-invisible-wand/comment-page-1/#comment-1441</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/07/21/the-invisible-wand/#comment-1441</guid>
		<description>Middle Earth is a very magical place. You read the books and you certainly get the view that magic suffuses the world and the culture, but there&#039;s actually very little onstage magic. Gandalf is a wizard, but he fights with a sword; he doesn&#039;t perform incantations or pull down lightning from the sky. Most of the magic, when it does occur, is of great import, but he never really gives wiring diagrams as to how it works. - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.beatrice.com/interviews/martin/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;George R. R. Martin&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Middle Earth is a very magical place. You read the books and you certainly get the view that magic suffuses the world and the culture, but there&#8217;s actually very little onstage magic. Gandalf is a wizard, but he fights with a sword; he doesn&#8217;t perform incantations or pull down lightning from the sky. Most of the magic, when it does occur, is of great import, but he never really gives wiring diagrams as to how it works. &#8211; <a href="http://www.beatrice.com/interviews/martin/" rel="nofollow">George R. R. Martin</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey Tompkins</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/07/21/the-invisible-wand/comment-page-1/#comment-1442</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey Tompkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/07/21/the-invisible-wand/#comment-1442</guid>
		<description>Well, Ron, it&#039;s obvious that both you and Ms. McArdle have little experience with the greater body of fantasy work out there.

To mention just one small example: common spellcasters might not be able to create or replicate spellbooks for several reasons. One might be that there is a defensive spell cast on the book which defends against replication; it might manifest itself in the same way that Hermione hexed the traitor who finked out Dumbledore&#039;s Army in book 5.

Another method would involve a self-imposed &lt;i&gt;geas&lt;/i&gt; invoked when purchasing the book, which would prevent the buyer from creating a copy. Naturally the &lt;i&gt;geas&lt;/i&gt; would include clauses preventing a friend who &quot;borrows&quot; the book from making copies as well.

Finally there&#039;s Terry Pratchett&#039;s ideas about magik, which are deeply linked to modern physics. For example, in Discworld, magik-users recognize it is incredibly difficult to create something (such as a book) out of nothing when one considers the potential energy required to create even a small object. It&#039;s e=mc&lt;strong&gt;2&lt;/strong&gt; with a vengance. A classic example is farie (or lepruchan) gold. It&#039;s easy to create, but does not last. In other words, the spell subtitutes entropy for energy. A gold coin may be created, but only until the next sunrise. To make a real coin out of genuine gold requires a master magician and resources at least equal in expense to the gold coin itself. Creating gold by magik is, hence, inherently uneconomical.

If Ms. McArdle had bothered to consult Europe&#039;s fables for (oh...) the past millenium, she might have  caught that concept...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Ron, it&#8217;s obvious that both you and Ms. McArdle have little experience with the greater body of fantasy work out there.</p>
<p>To mention just one small example: common spellcasters might not be able to create or replicate spellbooks for several reasons. One might be that there is a defensive spell cast on the book which defends against replication; it might manifest itself in the same way that Hermione hexed the traitor who finked out Dumbledore&#8217;s Army in book 5.</p>
<p>Another method would involve a self-imposed <i>geas</i> invoked when purchasing the book, which would prevent the buyer from creating a copy. Naturally the <i>geas</i> would include clauses preventing a friend who &#8220;borrows&#8221; the book from making copies as well.</p>
<p>Finally there&#8217;s Terry Pratchett&#8217;s ideas about magik, which are deeply linked to modern physics. For example, in Discworld, magik-users recognize it is incredibly difficult to create something (such as a book) out of nothing when one considers the potential energy required to create even a small object. It&#8217;s e=mc<strong>2</strong> with a vengance. A classic example is farie (or lepruchan) gold. It&#8217;s easy to create, but does not last. In other words, the spell subtitutes entropy for energy. A gold coin may be created, but only until the next sunrise. To make a real coin out of genuine gold requires a master magician and resources at least equal in expense to the gold coin itself. Creating gold by magik is, hence, inherently uneconomical.</p>
<p>If Ms. McArdle had bothered to consult Europe&#8217;s fables for (oh&#8230;) the past millenium, she might have  caught that concept&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Posts &#171; WordPress.com</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/07/21/the-invisible-wand/comment-page-1/#comment-1443</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Posts &#171; WordPress.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 23:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/07/21/the-invisible-wand/#comment-1443</guid>
		<description>[...] The invisible wand Megan McArdle asks the questions that many of us &#8212; especially the economics majors among us &#8212; have been [&#8230;] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The invisible wand Megan McArdle asks the questions that many of us &#8212; especially the economics majors among us &#8212; have been [&#8230;] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.242 seconds -->
