<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We are only amused</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/03/23/we-are-only-amused/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/03/23/we-are-only-amused/</link>
	<description>Ron Coleman’s retired general topic blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:32:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;The Victorian compromise&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/03/23/we-are-only-amused/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;The Victorian compromise&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/03/23/we-are-only-amused/#comment-375</guid>
		<description>[...] cannot be eradicated &#8212; i.e., any society, including ours, and ones far more ancient than the Victorians (though like so much they may have elevated it to a very high art!). Hypocrisy is the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] cannot be eradicated &#8212; i.e., any society, including ours, and ones far more ancient than the Victorians (though like so much they may have elevated it to a very high art!). Hypocrisy is the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two-bit imperialism &#171; Likelihood of Success</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/03/23/we-are-only-amused/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Two-bit imperialism &#171; Likelihood of Success</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 02:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/03/23/we-are-only-amused/#comment-374</guid>
		<description>[...] by Ron Coleman on December 5, 2007  I once fancied myself something of a neo-victorian. Perhaps there&#8217;s something to that. As Harvey says:  The venerable Archbishop of Canterbury [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Ron Coleman on December 5, 2007  I once fancied myself something of a neo-victorian. Perhaps there&#8217;s something to that. As Harvey says:  The venerable Archbishop of Canterbury [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sartorial meltdown &#171; Likelihood of Success</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/03/23/we-are-only-amused/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Sartorial meltdown &#171; Likelihood of Success</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/03/23/we-are-only-amused/#comment-373</guid>
		<description>[...] we have fallen (hat tip for that link to this fascinating blog; check out this, too).  It is the Victorian in me, I know, but I am comfortable with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we have fallen (hat tip for that link to this fascinating blog; check out this, too).  It is the Victorian in me, I know, but I am comfortable with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.271 seconds -->
